In re the Claim of Hall

285 A.D.2d 777, 728 N.Y.S.2d 560, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7414

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 15, 2000, which reduced claimant’s weekly unemployment insurance benefit rate to zero.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reducing claimant’s unemployment insurance benefit rate to zero. When claimant’s job was abolished, he chose one of three early retirement plans offered by the employer. Inasmuch as the record establishes that the retirement package was fully funded by the employer, we decline to disturb the Board’s decision (see, Labor Law § 600 [7]; see also, Matter of Cohen [Sweeney], 245 AD2d 934; Matter of Richmond [Roberts], 96 AD2d 1132).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Hall, 285 A.D.2d 777, 728 N.Y.S.2d 560, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7414 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

285 A.D.2d 777 (In re the Claim of Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Richmond
96 A.D.2d 1132 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
In re the Claim of Cohen
245 A.D.2d 934 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)