In re the Claim of Guzzone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Guzzone

51 A.D.2d 617, 377 N.Y.S.2d 819, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10949

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 617 (In re the Claim of Guzzone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Guzzone, 51 A.D.2d 617, 377 N.Y.S.2d 819, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10949 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 3, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant was employed by a corporation of which he was the sole stockholder for many years. Claimant sold the business and, as a result, lost his employment. There was no specific agreement that claimant would stay on after the sale of the business. Claimant lost his employment through his own volition in selling the .business. The record does not indicate any compelling necessity for the sale of the business. Substantial evidence supports the board’s decision (Matter of Gaudio [Catherwood], 28 AD2d 1038; Matter of Parnes [Catherwood], 27 AD2d 630; Matter of Liebermann [Catherwood], 25 [618]*618AD2d 903). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 3, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant was employed by a corporation of which he was the sole stockholder for many years. Claimant sold the business and, as a result, lost his employment. There was no specific agreement that claimant would stay on after the sale of the business. Claimant lost his employment through his own volition in selling the .business. The record does not indicate any compelling necessity for the sale of the business. Substantial evidence supports the board’s decision (Matter of Gaudio [Catherwood], 28 AD2d 1038; Matter of Parnes [Catherwood], 27 AD2d 630; Matter of Liebermann [Catherwood], 25 [618]*618AD2d 903). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 617, 377 N.Y.S.2d 819, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-guzzone-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack