In re the Claim of Grogan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Grogan

221 A.D.2d 793, 633 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11774

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 221 A.D.2d 793 (In re the Claim of Grogan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Grogan, 221 A.D.2d 793, 633 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11774 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 15, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause..

Claimant was employed by a temporary employment agency and was assigned to work for the Department of Social Services. After being confronted by a supervisor at the Department and informed that she had one more chance to improve her performance, she decided to leave her assignment. In view of these facts, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Crew III, J. P., White, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 15, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause..

Claimant was employed by a temporary employment agency and was assigned to work for the Department of Social Services. After being confronted by a supervisor at the Department and informed that she had one more chance to improve her performance, she decided to leave her assignment. In view of these facts, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Crew III, J. P., White, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 A.D.2d 793, 633 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-grogan-nyappdiv-1995.