In re the Claim of Griffin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Griffin

23 A.D.2d 902, 258 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4264

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.D.2d 902 (In re the Claim of Griffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Griffin, 23 A.D.2d 902, 258 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4264 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Hamm, J.

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying the claimant from benefits on the ground that he had voluntarily left his employment without good cause by provoking his discharge (Labor Law, § 593). The claimant contends that the board did not properly resolve the factual issues in dispute upon the weight of the evidence. At most factual questions are presented, and, as the board’s findings were supported by substantial evidence, we are without authority to disturb the determination (Labor Law, § 623; Matter of Hughes [Catherwood], 23 A D 2d 515). Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamm, J.

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying the claimant from benefits on the ground that he had voluntarily left his employment without good cause by provoking his discharge (Labor Law, § 593). The claimant contends that the board did not properly resolve the factual issues in dispute upon the weight of the evidence. At most factual questions are presented, and, as the board’s findings were supported by substantial evidence, we are without authority to disturb the determination (Labor Law, § 623; Matter of Hughes [Catherwood], 23 A D 2d 515). Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.2d 902, 258 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-griffin-nyappdiv-1965.