In re the Claim of Green

198 A.D.2d 700, 603 N.Y.S.2d 932, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10742
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the Claim of Green. Read the opinion of the Court — 178 A.D.2d 717

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 25, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked for Wells Fargo Alarm Services servicing security alarm systems. Given the sensitive position claimant held, substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant’s arrest and subsequent plea of guilty to two felonies reflected on his integrity and constituted misconduct.

Weiss, P. J., Mercure, Crew III and White, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Green, 198 A.D.2d 700, 603 N.Y.S.2d 932, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10742 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

198 A.D.2d 700 (In re the Claim of Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.