In re the Claim of Graziose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Graziose

50 A.D.2d 1030, 377 N.Y.S.2d 280, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12028

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 1030 (In re the Claim of Graziose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Graziose, 50 A.D.2d 1030, 377 N.Y.S.2d 280, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12028 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 30, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits because she lost her employment through misconduct. Claimant worked for her employer for 18 years until she was discharged for refusal to work overtime. The undisputed testimony is that claimant had been asked twice to work overtime on a Saturday and she refused. Her subsequent refusal, following these earlier refusals for which she had been given warnings, constituted substantial evidence in this record from which the board could justifiably conclude that claimant lost her employment through misconduct. Although claimant alleges that she was discharged because of her union activities, the record indicates that an unfair labor practice charge against her employer was dismissed by the regional director of the National Labor Relations Board and was affirmed on appeal. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Koreman, Main and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 30, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits because she lost her employment through misconduct. Claimant worked for her employer for 18 years until she was discharged for refusal to work overtime. The undisputed testimony is that claimant had been asked twice to work overtime on a Saturday and she refused. Her subsequent refusal, following these earlier refusals for which she had been given warnings, constituted substantial evidence in this record from which the board could justifiably conclude that claimant lost her employment through misconduct. Although claimant alleges that she was discharged because of her union activities, the record indicates that an unfair labor practice charge against her employer was dismissed by the regional director of the National Labor Relations Board and was affirmed on appeal. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Koreman, Main and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 1030, 377 N.Y.S.2d 280, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-graziose-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack