In re the Claim of Gorton

1 A.D.2d 682, 766 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1 A.D.3d 682, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11587
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 6, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 1 A.D.2d 682 (In re the Claim of Gorton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Gorton, 1 A.D.2d 682, 766 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1 A.D.3d 682, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11587 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 9, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from her employment as an assistant residential manager at a group home when she left work an hour before the end of her shift. The record establishes that claimant’s supervisor denied her request to leave early and claimant was warned that it would be considered insubordination if she disregarded the supervisor’s directive. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant lost her employment due to disqualifying misconduct.

We affirm. Leaving work early without authorization can constitute disqualifying misconduct (see Matter of Greenberg [Commissioner of Labor], 286 AD2d 794 [2001]; Matter of Patrick [La Salle School—Commissioner of Labor], 251 AD2d 944 [1998]). Although claimant maintains that she was otherwise without a ride home, the record establishes that she did not exhaust all possible transportation alternatives in order to protect her employment.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Santos
149 A.D.3d 1459 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
In re Claim of Williams
102 A.D.3d 1051 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
In re the Claim of Pedigo
57 A.D.3d 1188 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re the Claim of White
48 A.D.3d 854 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re the Claim of Peterson
32 A.D.3d 610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
In re the Claim of Shayo
4 A.D.3d 663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re the Claim of Waite
3 A.D.3d 766 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 A.D.2d 682, 766 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1 A.D.3d 682, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-gorton-nyappdiv-2003.