In Re the Claim of Goldstein

New York Court of Appeals

In Re the Claim of Goldstein

60 N.E.2d 132, 293 N.Y. 927, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2333

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 30, 1944

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 N.E.2d 132 (In Re the Claim of Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re the Claim of Goldstein, 60 N.E.2d 132, 293 N.Y. 927, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2333 (N.Y. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of Appellate Division reversed, with costs in this court, and decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirmed upon the sole ground, and as a matter of law, that Monday, January 11, 1943, the date on which appellant concededly reported, was a proper date for such reporting, under Rule jU.I' 18 — 41, as contended in his behalf by his counsel and as conceded by the Attorney-General in behalf of the Commis - sioneir, who consents to this disposition of the case. We pass on nd other question. Those which were considered below were in fact not presented by the record and cannot be considered here. No opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thaoher, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of Appellate Division reversed, with costs in this court, and decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirmed upon the sole ground, and as a matter of law, that Monday, January 11, 1943, the date on which appellant concededly reported, was a proper date for such reporting, under Rule jU.I' 18 — 41, as contended in his behalf by his counsel and as conceded by the Attorney-General in behalf of the Commis - sioneir, who consents to this disposition of the case. We pass on nd other question. Those which were considered below were in fact not presented by the record and cannot be considered here. No opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thaoher, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 N.E.2d 132, 293 N.Y. 927, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-goldstein-ny-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack