In re the Claim of Goldberg

31 A.D.2d 580, 295 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2868
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 21, 1968·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. Decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which disqualified claimant from benefits, on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause by provoking her discharge, affirmed, without costs. There were involved purely factual issues which' the board resolved upon substantial evidence, including claimant’s signed summary of interview. The time factors are proper subjects of judicial notice. The evidentiary effect to be given the employer’s letters was for the board. They are without legal effect for, as respondent correctly argues, it is immaterial .that the employer may not object to the payment of benefits. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Goldberg, 31 A.D.2d 580, 295 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

31 A.D.2d 580 (In re the Claim of Goldberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of McCarthy
298 A.D.2d 827 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
In re the Claim of Briem
71 A.D.2d 752 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
In re the Claim of McNeil
50 A.D.2d 1050 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)