In re the Claim of Gatza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Gatza

247 A.D.2d 747, 669 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1569

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 19, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 247 A.D.2d 747 (In re the Claim of Gatza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Gatza, 247 A.D.2d 747, 669 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 9, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

[748]*748Claimant was employed as a hairdresser and was paid on a commission basis. She resigned after realizing that, based on the total number of hours she worked, the commission she earned was less than the minimum wage. Claimant did not, however, discuss this concern with her employer prior to her resignation. Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s ruling that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause. It has previously been held that dissatisfaction with one’s wages does not constitute good cause for leaving one’s employment (see, Matter of Stoddard [Sweeney], 242 AD2d 817), particularly where, as here, the claimant fails to protect his or her employment by bringing the concern to the employer’s attention prior to resigning (see, Matter of Abrams [Sweeney], 240 AD2d 833). The record also supports the Board’s finding that claimant quit because of her inability to get along with a co-worker, a reason which has been found to be insufficient to establish good cause under the Labor Law (see, Matter of Elkan-Moore [Hudacs], 191 AD2d 914).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 9, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

[748]*748Claimant was employed as a hairdresser and was paid on a commission basis. She resigned after realizing that, based on the total number of hours she worked, the commission she earned was less than the minimum wage. Claimant did not, however, discuss this concern with her employer prior to her resignation. Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s ruling that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause. It has previously been held that dissatisfaction with one’s wages does not constitute good cause for leaving one’s employment (see, Matter of Stoddard [Sweeney], 242 AD2d 817), particularly where, as here, the claimant fails to protect his or her employment by bringing the concern to the employer’s attention prior to resigning (see, Matter of Abrams [Sweeney], 240 AD2d 833). The record also supports the Board’s finding that claimant quit because of her inability to get along with a co-worker, a reason which has been found to be insufficient to establish good cause under the Labor Law (see, Matter of Elkan-Moore [Hudacs], 191 AD2d 914).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D.2d 747, 669 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-gatza-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack