In re the Claim of Garrow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Garrow

52 A.D.2d 708, 382 N.Y.S.2d 588, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12390

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 A.D.2d 708 (In re the Claim of Garrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Garrow, 52 A.D.2d 708, 382 N.Y.S.2d 588, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12390 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 12, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective June 1, 1974 because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The issue is not whether pregnancy provides good cause for leaving one’s employment. It does, provided claimant uses extant rule for leave for such purpose. Claimant did not and there is substantial evidence in the record to prove that claimant had no intention of returning to work at the hospital after her child was born. Decision affirmed, without costs. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Mahoney, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 12, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective June 1, 1974 because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The issue is not whether pregnancy provides good cause for leaving one’s employment. It does, provided claimant uses extant rule for leave for such purpose. Claimant did not and there is substantial evidence in the record to prove that claimant had no intention of returning to work at the hospital after her child was born. Decision affirmed, without costs. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Mahoney, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 708, 382 N.Y.S.2d 588, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-garrow-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack