In re the Claim of Garcia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Garcia

202 A.D.2d 797, 609 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2541

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 202 A.D.2d 797 (In re the Claim of Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Garcia, 202 A.D.2d 797, 609 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 15, 1993, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he refused employment without good cause.

After arguing with one of his employer’s major customers, claimant lost his job as a messenger after refusing to promise to avoid any future disagreements with this customer. The employer subsequently offered claimant a job at the employer’s other location so that claimant could avoid this particular customer, but claimant refused. Under the circumstances, we [798]*798find substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant refused an offer of employment without good cause.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 15, 1993, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he refused employment without good cause.

After arguing with one of his employer’s major customers, claimant lost his job as a messenger after refusing to promise to avoid any future disagreements with this customer. The employer subsequently offered claimant a job at the employer’s other location so that claimant could avoid this particular customer, but claimant refused. Under the circumstances, we [798]*798find substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant refused an offer of employment without good cause.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 A.D.2d 797, 609 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-garcia-nyappdiv-1994.