In re the Claim of Gallo

206 A.D.2d 649, 614 N.Y.S.2d 617, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7345
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 14, 1994·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 23, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

[650] The Board found that claimant, a bank teller, did not follow bank procedure when she failed to enter any transactions on her computer as required and that tellers were excused from recording only simple transactions. The Board also found that claimant was already on notice for prior infractions and had been warned that any further violation of bank procedure could result in termination. Given these findings and the record before us, there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant lost her job due to misconduct and that she was therefore disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits.

Cardona, P. J., White, Weiss, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Gallo, 206 A.D.2d 649, 614 N.Y.S.2d 617, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7345 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

206 A.D.2d 649 (In re the Claim of Gallo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re McKinley
249 A.D.2d 864 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re the Claim of Briere
238 A.D.2d 647 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re the Claim of Kobe
235 A.D.2d 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re the Claim of Imondi
233 A.D.2d 736 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
In re the Claim of Strauss
229 A.D.2d 652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)