In re the Claim of Gadamowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Gadamowitz

213 A.D.2d 912, 624 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3079

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 23, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 213 A.D.2d 912 (In re the Claim of Gadamowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Gadamowitz, 213 A.D.2d 912, 624 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3079 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 29, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

The Board found that claimant left her position as an executive secretary in order to pursue other job interviews and that she did not request leave time on the final occasion before she made her decision to quit her job. Instead, she simply concluded that her employer would not grant her enough time off. The Board concluded that, under the circumstances, claimant’s leaving in order to search for other work [913]*913was for personal and noncompelling reasons and that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Insofar as there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s decision, it must be upheld. Claimant’s procedural arguments have been considered and rejected.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 29, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

The Board found that claimant left her position as an executive secretary in order to pursue other job interviews and that she did not request leave time on the final occasion before she made her decision to quit her job. Instead, she simply concluded that her employer would not grant her enough time off. The Board concluded that, under the circumstances, claimant’s leaving in order to search for other work [913]*913was for personal and noncompelling reasons and that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Insofar as there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s decision, it must be upheld. Claimant’s procedural arguments have been considered and rejected.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 A.D.2d 912, 624 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-gadamowitz-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack