In re the Claim of Fusfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Fusfeld

19 A.D.2d 678, 241 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3488

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.2d 678 (In re the Claim of Fusfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Fusfeld, 19 A.D.2d 678, 241 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3488 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which disqualified claimant from, benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant stated that he .quit his job as stock manager or stock clerk because he was not given sufficient assistance and that by reason thereof he was subjected to pressure, tension and aggrava[679]*679tian which he feared would endanger his health. It was within the board’s province to determine the weight and credibility of claimant’s testimony and that of the employer’s representative and we cannot, upon this record, disturb its finding that good cause was not shown. (Matter of Gorman [Catherwood], 17 A D 2d 885.) Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which disqualified claimant from, benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant stated that he .quit his job as stock manager or stock clerk because he was not given sufficient assistance and that by reason thereof he was subjected to pressure, tension and aggrava[679]*679tian which he feared would endanger his health. It was within the board’s province to determine the weight and credibility of claimant’s testimony and that of the employer’s representative and we cannot, upon this record, disturb its finding that good cause was not shown. (Matter of Gorman [Catherwood], 17 A D 2d 885.) Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.2d 678, 241 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-fusfeld-nyappdiv-1963.