In re the Claim of Frenya

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Frenya

212 A.D.2d 921, 623 N.Y.S.2d 173, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1609

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 212 A.D.2d 921 (In re the Claim of Frenya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Frenya, 212 A.D.2d 921, 623 N.Y.S.2d 173, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1609 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 18, 1993, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

In concluding that claimant, a registered nurse, left her job for personal and noncompelling reasons, the Board found that she did not take the actions of a prudent person in bringing her alleged problems with her employer to the attention of her supervisor who was ready to assist claimant at all times. The Board also found no evidence that claimant was required to perform any acts that were illegal or unethical. Given these findings and the record before us, we find substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 18, 1993, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

In concluding that claimant, a registered nurse, left her job for personal and noncompelling reasons, the Board found that she did not take the actions of a prudent person in bringing her alleged problems with her employer to the attention of her supervisor who was ready to assist claimant at all times. The Board also found no evidence that claimant was required to perform any acts that were illegal or unethical. Given these findings and the record before us, we find substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 A.D.2d 921, 623 N.Y.S.2d 173, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-frenya-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack