In re the Claim of Forrester

51 A.D.2d 1077, 381 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11917

This text of 51 A.D.2d 1077 (In re the Claim of Forrester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Forrester, 51 A.D.2d 1077, 381 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 26, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding claimant ineligible to receive benefits, charging claimant with an overpayment ruled to be recoverable, and holding that he willfully made false statements in order to receive benefits and imposing a penalty therefor against his future benefit rights. Claimant, an electronic data processing manager, while receiving Unemployment Insurance benefits, certified on several occasions that he was totally unemployed when, in fact, he had obtained employment with the New York City Human Resources Administration at an annual salary of approximately $18,000. At his hearing the claimant admitted that he was employed and continued to receive benefits, but apparently attempted to justify his conduct by asserting that losses he sustained in personal business ventures offset the Unemployment Insurance benefits. Claimant’s admission eliminates any issue as to total unemployment. As to the issue of whether or not the representations were willful, this is an issue solely within the province of the board and where, as here, such determination is supported by substantial evidence, it must be affirmed (Matter of Juris [Catherwood], 33 AD2d 852). The decision of the board must, in all respects, be affirmed. [1078]*1078Decision affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Juris
33 A.D.2d 852 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 A.D.2d 1077, 381 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-forrester-nyappdiv-1976.