In re the Claim of Foley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Foley

205 A.D.2d 817, 613 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5814

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 205 A.D.2d 817 (In re the Claim of Foley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Foley, 205 A.D.2d 817, 613 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 27, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

The Board found that claimant left his employment as a doorkeeper because he wanted a position in a building with a smaller lobby. It concluded that claimant left his job for personal and noncompelling reasons and that he was therefore disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits. Insofar as the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence, it must be upheld. Claimant’s contentions to the contrary raise questions of fact and credibility which were for the Board to resolve.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 27, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

The Board found that claimant left his employment as a doorkeeper because he wanted a position in a building with a smaller lobby. It concluded that claimant left his job for personal and noncompelling reasons and that he was therefore disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits. Insofar as the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence, it must be upheld. Claimant’s contentions to the contrary raise questions of fact and credibility which were for the Board to resolve.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 817, 613 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-foley-nyappdiv-1994.