In re the Claim of Flynn

209 A.D.2d 811, 618 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11096
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 28, 1993, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he did not work a sufficient number of days of subsequent employment to terminate his prior disqualification from receiving benefits.

Claimant had initially been held to be ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he left his job without good cause. Following this disqualification, claimant worked for a different employer for five weeks. The Board ruled that, although this subsequent employment met some of the requirements necessary to terminate a disqualification, claimant nevertheless did not meet the requirement in Labor Law § 593 (1) (a) of working three days in each of the five weeks. Our review of the record reveals substantial evidence to support the Board’s determination that claimant did not have a sufficient number of days of subsequent employment to break his prior disqualification.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Flynn, 209 A.D.2d 811, 618 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

209 A.D.2d 811 (In re the Claim of Flynn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Greene
221 A.D.2d 789 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)