In re the Claim of Flowers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Flowers

219 A.D.2d 749, 631 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9153

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 7, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 219 A.D.2d 749 (In re the Claim of Flowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Flowers, 219 A.D.2d 749, 631 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9153 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 3, 1994, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant, a housekeeper, injured her back on March 10, 1994 and was ordered by her doctor to remain out of work from April 12, 1994 through May 10, 1994. However, on or about April 18, 1994, claimant resigned from her job and, shortly thereafter, moved to South Carolina to visit dying relatives. Inasmuch as the foregoing facts are undisputed, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause and also that she was ineligible to receive benefits during the time she was disabled. Accordingly, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 3, 1994, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant, a housekeeper, injured her back on March 10, 1994 and was ordered by her doctor to remain out of work from April 12, 1994 through May 10, 1994. However, on or about April 18, 1994, claimant resigned from her job and, shortly thereafter, moved to South Carolina to visit dying relatives. Inasmuch as the foregoing facts are undisputed, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause and also that she was ineligible to receive benefits during the time she was disabled. Accordingly, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 A.D.2d 749, 631 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-flowers-nyappdiv-1995.