In re the Claim of Flores

50 A.D.2d 1006, 376 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11987
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 18, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 1006 (In re the Claim of Flores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Flores, 50 A.D.2d 1006, 376 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11987 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 16, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective January 30, 1975, on the ground that he lost his employment as a result of misconduct. On the last day of claimant’s employment, he refused a request by the employer to work overtime to complete a process that he had started. The credible evidence establishes that claimant had known, on the basis of past practice, that an hour or two of overtime could be required when a process had to be completed. Claimant did not offer a compelling reason for refusing to work overtime, and did not attempt to ask another [1007]*1007employee to work overtime for him, which his supervisor advised him to do. Under the circumstances, the board could properly find that claimant without good cause refused a reasonable request of the employer and thus was guilty of misconduct. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Main, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Immerso
195 A.D.2d 733 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Claim of Lange
178 A.D.2d 891 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
In re the Claim of Arzuaga
173 A.D.2d 1044 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
In re the Claim of Whitehead
168 A.D.2d 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 A.D.2d 1006, 376 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-flores-nyappdiv-1975.