In re the Claim of Finelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Finelli

52 A.D.2d 681, 382 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12351

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 A.D.2d 681 (In re the Claim of Finelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Finelli, 52 A.D.2d 681, 382 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 14, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective January 25, 1975 on the ground that he lost his employment through misconduct for a suspension period of four weeks. Claimant was suspended by his employer following a fight with a fellow employee in which he broke his nose. Substantial evidence supports the factual finding of the board that claimant was guilty of misconduct which justified suspension of his employment for a period of four weeks. Decision affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 14, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective January 25, 1975 on the ground that he lost his employment through misconduct for a suspension period of four weeks. Claimant was suspended by his employer following a fight with a fellow employee in which he broke his nose. Substantial evidence supports the factual finding of the board that claimant was guilty of misconduct which justified suspension of his employment for a period of four weeks. Decision affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 681, 382 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-finelli-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack