In re the Claim of Ferrugia

233 A.D.2d 742, 650 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12063
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 21, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 233 A.D.2d 742 (In re the Claim of Ferrugia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Ferrugia, 233 A.D.2d 742, 650 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12063 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 5, 1996, which ruled thát claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

The record discloses that claimant left her employment as a secretary for an insurance agency following a reprimand from a senior co-worker regarding her late arrival at work. The employer made a good-faith effort to facilitate a reconciliation between claimant and her co-worker, but claimant found the latter’s behavior so offensive that she refused to return to her employment.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the decision finding claimant disqualified from receiving benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good [743]*743cause. Inability to get along with a co-worker does not constitute good cause for leaving one’s employment (see, Matter of Ikehara [Hudacs], 196 AD2d 911, 912). To the extent that claimant’s testimony regarding the discord that led to her resignation conflicted with that of her employer and co-worker, such contradictions merely raised an issue of credibility whose resolution lay within the province of the Board (see, Matter of Ortas [Hudacs], 187 AD2d 851, 852).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Casey and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Gardiner
272 A.D.2d 709 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Claim of Targett
250 A.D.2d 903 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re the Claim of Nunez
244 A.D.2d 742 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re the Claim of Nalick
243 A.D.2d 809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 A.D.2d 742, 650 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-ferrugia-nyappdiv-1996.