In re the Claim of Fernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Fernandez

50 A.D.2d 659, 375 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12491

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 659 (In re the Claim of Fernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Fernandez, 50 A.D.2d 659, 375 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12491 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 16, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding claimant ineligible to receive benefits effective December 16, 1974 because she was not available for employment. Claimant, a legal secretary, has been denied benefits because her meager and sporadic efforts to locate employment have effectively made her unavailable for employment. This finding is supported by substantial evidence and, as a question of fact, is in the sole province of the board for determination (Matter of Bennett [Catherwood], 33 AD2d 946). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Koreman and Main, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 16, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding claimant ineligible to receive benefits effective December 16, 1974 because she was not available for employment. Claimant, a legal secretary, has been denied benefits because her meager and sporadic efforts to locate employment have effectively made her unavailable for employment. This finding is supported by substantial evidence and, as a question of fact, is in the sole province of the board for determination (Matter of Bennett [Catherwood], 33 AD2d 946). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Koreman and Main, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 659, 375 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-fernandez-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack