In re the Claim of Fata

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Fata

52 A.D.2d 694, 382 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12364

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 22, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 A.D.2d 694 (In re the Claim of Fata) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Fata, 52 A.D.2d 694, 382 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12364 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 14, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits on the ground that he lost his employment through misconduct. Claimant was employed as a commission salesperson in a store which had a policy of giving 10% discounts to store employees who made purchases for their own use or for the use of immediate members of their families. The board found that claimant, who was aware of the company policy, violated it by granting the discount on a sale to a cousin of an employee. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the finding of the board. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 14, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits on the ground that he lost his employment through misconduct. Claimant was employed as a commission salesperson in a store which had a policy of giving 10% discounts to store employees who made purchases for their own use or for the use of immediate members of their families. The board found that claimant, who was aware of the company policy, violated it by granting the discount on a sale to a cousin of an employee. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the finding of the board. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 694, 382 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-fata-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack