In re the Claim of Fascaldo

283 A.D.2d 827, 724 N.Y.S.2d 371, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5182
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 17, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 283 A.D.2d 827 (In re the Claim of Fascaldo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Fascaldo, 283 A.D.2d 827, 724 N.Y.S.2d 371, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5182 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 19, 2000, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from her employment as a bank teller for violating the employer’s policy regarding check cashing procedures. On January 19, 2000, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because she was terminated due to misconduct. Claimant thereafter applied to the Board for a re[828]*828opening and reconsideration of the January 19, 2000 decision. On March 30, 2000, the Board denied this request. In the interim, claimant filed a notice of appeal on March 15, 2000 from the original decision. Claimant has not appealed from the denial of her request for reopening and reconsideration.

Inasmuch as claimant’s appeal is untimely, we will not consider the merits. Labor Law § 624 provides that an appeal from a decision of the Board must be filed within 30 days. Claimant’s notice of appeal from the Board’s decision of January 19, 2000 was not filed until March 15, 2000, well after the 30-day limitations period had expired (see, Matter of Rogers [Community Health Ctr. — Commissioner of Labor], 268 AD2d 937). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as untimely.

Mercure, J. P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as untimely, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Welsh
51 A.D.3d 1351 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re the Claim of Andronica
43 A.D.3d 1222 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re the Claim of Bostic
288 A.D.2d 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 A.D.2d 827, 724 N.Y.S.2d 371, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-fascaldo-nyappdiv-2001.