In re the Claim of Estremera

244 A.D.2d 694, 664 N.Y.S.2d 376, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11474
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 13, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 244 A.D.2d 694 (In re the Claim of Estremera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Estremera, 244 A.D.2d 694, 664 N.Y.S.2d 376, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11474 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 7, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was employed as a tractor-trailer driver until he was discharged as the result of his refusal to accept an assignment to drive to New Jersey on a Friday afternoon. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant [695]*695lost his employment under disqualifying circumstances. Substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. This Court has held that an employee’s refusal to accept reasonable work assignments may constitute insubordination rising to the level of disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Wilson [Sweeney], 236 AD2d 729; Matter of David [Sweeney], 224 AD2d 793). We conclude that this matter constitutes such a case. Our review of the record further discloses that claimant’s assertions regarding the inadequacy of the Spanish language interpreter at his administrative hearing are without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Goodrich
301 A.D.2d 720 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re the Claim of Legault
286 A.D.2d 795 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
In re the Claim of Cannavina
284 A.D.2d 766 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
In re the Claim of Jackson
275 A.D.2d 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Claim of Monroe
270 A.D.2d 558 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Claim of Hirschfeld
256 A.D.2d 710 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 A.D.2d 694, 664 N.Y.S.2d 376, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-estremera-nyappdiv-1997.