In re the Claim of Durivage

220 A.D.2d 916, 632 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10176
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 19, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 21,1994, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she refused offers of suitable employment without good cause.

[917]*917Claimant was employed as a licensed practical nurse for a nonprofit agency which provides nursing services to private individuals and institutions. She was denied unemployment insurance benefits because she refused various assignments offered to her by her employer during the month of February 1993. Claimant contends that she was justified in refusing these assignments because she believed they involved work that she was not qualified to do. The record, however, reveals that the assignments were all licensed practical nurse cases and that while claimant believed these assignments involved work that she was not qualified to do, she did not have confirmation of this fact. Under these circumstances, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision.

Crew III, J. P., White, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Durivage, 220 A.D.2d 916, 632 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10176 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

220 A.D.2d 916 (In re the Claim of Durivage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Wilson
241 A.D.2d 653 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)