In re the Claim of Du Bois

282 A.D.2d 858, 723 N.Y.S.2d 539, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3688
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 12, 2001·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 20, 2000, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

After claimant’s employment was terminated because she falsified time records when she was late for work, her claim for unemployment insurance benefits was denied on the ground that she lost her employment under disqualifying conditions. An employee’s falsification of time records can constitute disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Granek [Commissioner of Labor], 262 AD2d 680) and there is evidence in the record, including the testimony of the employer’s representative and claimant’s admissions, which provides substantial evidence to support the finding that claimant falsified her time sheet. Claimant’s exculpatory explanation for her conduct created a question of credibility for the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board to resolve (see, id.).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Du Bois, 282 A.D.2d 858, 723 N.Y.S.2d 539, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3688 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

282 A.D.2d 858 (In re the Claim of Du Bois) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Fulcher
32 A.D.3d 1064 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
In re the Claim of Newkirk
15 A.D.3d 827 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
In re the Claim of Thomas
12 A.D.3d 810 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re the Claim of Noel
306 A.D.2d 671 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re the Claim of Richardson
301 A.D.2d 1004 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re the Claim of Sonzogni
301 A.D.2d 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re the Claim of Kelly
288 A.D.2d 539 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)