In re the Claim of Drechsler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Drechsler

197 A.D.2d 739, 602 N.Y.S.2d 447, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9048

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 7, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 197 A.D.2d 739 (In re the Claim of Drechsler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Drechsler, 197 A.D.2d 739, 602 N.Y.S.2d 447, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9048 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 23, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant admitted that on August 20, 1991 he was advised by his employer that he was being discharged on September 20, 1991. According to the employer, upon being so notified claimant said that he would not wait until September 20, 1991. Claimant also admitted that he left work on August 20, 1991 and did not return. Given these facts and the record before us, there is substantial evidence to support the conclusion by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant abandoned his employment in anticipation of discharge, and that he therefore voluntarily left his job without good cause (see, Matter of Mastro [Levine] 52 AD2d 708). Claimant’s arguments on this appeal concern conflicts in the evidence and credibility matters which were for the Board to resolve (see, Matter of Baker [Hartnett] 147 AD2d 790, appeal dismissed 74 NY2d 714).

Weiss, P. J., Mercure, Cardona, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 23, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant admitted that on August 20, 1991 he was advised by his employer that he was being discharged on September 20, 1991. According to the employer, upon being so notified claimant said that he would not wait until September 20, 1991. Claimant also admitted that he left work on August 20, 1991 and did not return. Given these facts and the record before us, there is substantial evidence to support the conclusion by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant abandoned his employment in anticipation of discharge, and that he therefore voluntarily left his job without good cause (see, Matter of Mastro [Levine] 52 AD2d 708). Claimant’s arguments on this appeal concern conflicts in the evidence and credibility matters which were for the Board to resolve (see, Matter of Baker [Hartnett] 147 AD2d 790, appeal dismissed 74 NY2d 714).

Weiss, P. J., Mercure, Cardona, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 A.D.2d 739, 602 N.Y.S.2d 447, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-drechsler-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack