In re the Claim of Dragoi

288 A.D.2d 685, 732 N.Y.S.2d 685, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10907
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 288 A.D.2d 685 (In re the Claim of Dragoi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Dragoi, 288 A.D.2d 685, 732 N.Y.S.2d 685, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 14, 2000, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant left his employment as a delivery driver for a jewelry store after additional customers were added to his route and his request for a raise was denied. It is well settled that dissatisfaction with one’s work assignment and wages does not constitute good cause for [686]*686leaving employment (see, Matter of Pietropaolo [Commissioner of Labor], 271 AD2d 795; Matter of Sibertzeff [Commissioner of Labor], 264 AD2d 936). Although claimant maintains that he was fired, the employer’s testimony to the contrary presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see, Matter of Parisi [Commissioner of Labor], 284 AD2d 881). Claimant’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Jenkins
57 A.D.3d 1068 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re the Claim of Chipman
308 A.D.2d 652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re the Claim of Preston
298 A.D.2d 823 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
In re the Claim of Williams
297 A.D.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
288 A.D.2d 685, 732 N.Y.S.2d 685, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-dragoi-nyappdiv-2001.