In re the Claim of Dodson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Dodson

214 A.D.2d 829, 625 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4239

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 13, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 214 A.D.2d 829 (In re the Claim of Dodson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Dodson, 214 A.D.2d 829, 625 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4239 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 5, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

[830]*830Claimant was employed as a social worker in a group home run by the employer, a child and family services organization. The record supports the Board’s finding that claimant failed to submit completed case notes for children under her care and that, after her supervisor returned the case notes to her for completion, she failed to do so and her supervisor had to complete them herself. The record also indicates that claimant had previously failed to timely submit proper records after being told to do so. We find no basis to disturb the Board’s decision that this conduct constitutes misconduct disqualifying claimant from unemployment insurance benefits.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 5, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

[830]*830Claimant was employed as a social worker in a group home run by the employer, a child and family services organization. The record supports the Board’s finding that claimant failed to submit completed case notes for children under her care and that, after her supervisor returned the case notes to her for completion, she failed to do so and her supervisor had to complete them herself. The record also indicates that claimant had previously failed to timely submit proper records after being told to do so. We find no basis to disturb the Board’s decision that this conduct constitutes misconduct disqualifying claimant from unemployment insurance benefits.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 A.D.2d 829, 625 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-dodson-nyappdiv-1995.