In re the Claim of Dobbins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Dobbins

201 A.D.2d 814, 607 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1164

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 814 (In re the Claim of Dobbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Dobbins, 201 A.D.2d 814, 607 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1164 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 30, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

The Board found that claimant abandoned his employment rather than obey an order to work an additional 15 minutes and that claimant was required to work until his duties were completed. Although claimant presented a different version of the events surrounding his loss of employment, this merely raised a question of credibility which was for the Board to resolve. The Board’s conclusion that claimant left his job voluntarily and without good cause is supported by substantial evidence in the record and should be upheld.

Mikoll, J. P., White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 30, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

The Board found that claimant abandoned his employment rather than obey an order to work an additional 15 minutes and that claimant was required to work until his duties were completed. Although claimant presented a different version of the events surrounding his loss of employment, this merely raised a question of credibility which was for the Board to resolve. The Board’s conclusion that claimant left his job voluntarily and without good cause is supported by substantial evidence in the record and should be upheld.

Mikoll, J. P., White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 814, 607 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-dobbins-nyappdiv-1994.