In re the Claim of Didiot

202 A.D.2d 941, 609 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3042
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 31, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 23, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant was employed as an administrative aide by an agency of the City of New York. The record establishes that claimant’s position required that she maintain her residence [942]*942in New York City and that she moved out of New York City in contravention of this requirement and resigned in lieu of discharge. This evidence provides substantial evidence to support the Board’s finding that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Casey, Weiss and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Didiot, 202 A.D.2d 941, 609 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3042 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

202 A.D.2d 941 (In re the Claim of Didiot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Williams
47 A.D.3d 994 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)