In re the Claim of Di Lorenzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Di Lorenzo

50 A.D.2d 626, 375 N.Y.S.2d 48, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12433

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 626 (In re the Claim of Di Lorenzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Di Lorenzo, 50 A.D.2d 626, 375 N.Y.S.2d 48, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12433 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 2, 1974, which reversed a referee’s decision and sustained the Industrial Commissioner’s initial determination that the claimant was disqualified from benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The claimant admits she left her work by a resignation and the record contains substantial evidence to support the finding of the board that it was voluntary and without good cause. While the claimant was going to be limited to doing one type of clerical work, it was the type of work for which she was hired. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 2, 1974, which reversed a referee’s decision and sustained the Industrial Commissioner’s initial determination that the claimant was disqualified from benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The claimant admits she left her work by a resignation and the record contains substantial evidence to support the finding of the board that it was voluntary and without good cause. While the claimant was going to be limited to doing one type of clerical work, it was the type of work for which she was hired. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 626, 375 N.Y.S.2d 48, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-di-lorenzo-nyappdiv-1975.