In re the Claim of Denzel

468 N.E.2d 699, 62 N.Y.2d 1012, 479 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4489
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 2, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 468 N.E.2d 699 (In re the Claim of Denzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Denzel, 468 N.E.2d 699, 62 N.Y.2d 1012, 479 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4489 (N.Y. 1984).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, with costs, and the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reinstated for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Justice John T. Casey at the Appellate Division (98 AD2d 931, 932).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Wacksman
129 A.D.2d 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
468 N.E.2d 699, 62 N.Y.2d 1012, 479 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-denzel-ny-1984.