In re the Claim of Dendy

172 A.D.2d 936, 568 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4570
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 11, 1991·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 31, 1989, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

After a hearing, an arbitrator found that claimant and other banquet waiters employed by a hotel had stolen wallets provided as banquet favors for distribution to guests. The Administrative Law Judge, holding that he was bound by the arbitrator’s finding, then ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because such behavior constituted misconduct; the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirmed this decision. The Administrative Law Judge was bound by the arbitrator’s findings of fact, i.e., that claimant stole the wallets that were found in his locker (see, Matter of Ranni [Ross], 58 NY2d 715, 717-718). The record therefore contains substantial evidence to support the decision that this behavior amounted to misconduct (see, Matter of Sylvester [Hartnett], 143 AD2d 478).

Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Dendy, 172 A.D.2d 936, 568 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

172 A.D.2d 936 (In re the Claim of Dendy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Scott
265 A.D.2d 777 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
In re the Claim of Hanson
254 A.D.2d 652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)