In re the Claim of Del Valle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Del Valle

232 A.D.2d 809, 649 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10253

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 17, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 232 A.D.2d 809 (In re the Claim of Del Valle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Del Valle, 232 A.D.2d 809, 649 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10253 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 29, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Shortly after July 13, 1995, claimant admittedly received and read a notice disqualifying him from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his position as a presser at a clothing company without good cause. The notification, dated July 13, 1995, specifically informed claimant that he had 30 days from its date to request a hearing to contest the denial of benefits (see, Labor Law § 620 [1] [a]). Claimant’s request for a hearing, filed September 19, 1995, was therefore untimely (see, Matter of Hart [Hudacs], 199 AD2d 667).

Crew III, J. P., "White, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 29, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Shortly after July 13, 1995, claimant admittedly received and read a notice disqualifying him from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his position as a presser at a clothing company without good cause. The notification, dated July 13, 1995, specifically informed claimant that he had 30 days from its date to request a hearing to contest the denial of benefits (see, Labor Law § 620 [1] [a]). Claimant’s request for a hearing, filed September 19, 1995, was therefore untimely (see, Matter of Hart [Hudacs], 199 AD2d 667).

Crew III, J. P., "White, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 A.D.2d 809, 649 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-del-valle-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack