In re the Claim of Decker

50 A.D.2d 1030, 376 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12029
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 23, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 1030 (In re the Claim of Decker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Decker, 50 A.D.2d 1030, 376 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12029 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

— Appeals from (1) a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 23, 1974, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding claimant ineligible to receive benefits effective January 14, 1974 because he was not totally unemployed and (2) a decision of the appeal board, filed October 22, 1974, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective June 29, 1974 because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant was president and sole stockholder of a real estate corporation and owned five rental properties in his own name. He participated in the business and in the rental and maintenance of his properties. The board’s finding that he was not totally unemployed during the period involved is supported by substantial evidence. The board’s finding that claimant volun[1031]*1031tarily left his employment with Alron Industries, Inc., is likewise supported by substantial evidence. The record discloses that claimant, after a period of three months employment, demanded twice the salary he was receiving and, when this was refused, terminated his employment. Dissatisfaction with wages does not constitute good cause for leaving employment (Matter of Lubin [Catherwood], 34 AD2d 591). The question of claimant’s job duties and responsibilities being altered by the employer is a factual one within the province of the board (Matter of Rubinstein [Catherwood] 33 AD2d 950). Decisions affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Main, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Lewis
195 A.D.2d 680 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Claim of Cattan
187 A.D.2d 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re the Claim of Crivelli
179 A.D.2d 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re the Claim of Pristina
169 A.D.2d 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 A.D.2d 1030, 376 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-decker-nyappdiv-1975.