In re the Claim of De Salvo

249 A.D.2d 619, 670 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3595
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 2, 1998·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 16, 1997, which reduced claimant’s weekly unemployment, insurance benefit rate to zero.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reducing claimant’s benefit rate to zero. The record establishes that claimant received a monthly pension which had been fully funded by the employer. Consequently, claimant’s unemployment insurance benefits were properly reduced by the amount of her pension benefits (see, Labor Law § 600 [7]; Matter of Levin [Sweeney], 244 AD2d 642).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of De Salvo, 249 A.D.2d 619, 670 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3595 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

249 A.D.2d 619 (In re the Claim of De Salvo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Hughes
270 A.D.2d 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Claim of Hammer
263 A.D.2d 608 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)