In re the Claim of De Franco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of De Franco

51 A.D.2d 615, 378 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10944

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 615 (In re the Claim of De Franco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of De Franco, 51 A.D.2d 615, 378 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10944 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 3, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding claimant ineligible to receive benefits effective June 2, 1975 because he was not totally unemployed. Claimant was licensed to sell life and casualty insurance. The board found that he was "actively engaged in the collection and return of premiums to the various carriers with which he is associated and earned renewal commissions from June 2 to the date of this hearing”. Although claimant’s income resulting from these activities may have been minimal, the board could properly find, on the evidence, that claimant was not totally unemployed. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 3, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding claimant ineligible to receive benefits effective June 2, 1975 because he was not totally unemployed. Claimant was licensed to sell life and casualty insurance. The board found that he was "actively engaged in the collection and return of premiums to the various carriers with which he is associated and earned renewal commissions from June 2 to the date of this hearing”. Although claimant’s income resulting from these activities may have been minimal, the board could properly find, on the evidence, that claimant was not totally unemployed. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 615, 378 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-de-franco-nyappdiv-1976.