In re the Claim of Darrisaw

51 A.D.2d 1098, 381 N.Y.S.2d 361, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11955
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 25, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 51 A.D.2d 1098 (In re the Claim of Darrisaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Darrisaw, 51 A.D.2d 1098, 381 N.Y.S.2d 361, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 17, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective November 1, 1974 because he lost his employment through misconduct in connection therewith. Claimant was absent from his work on several occasions. He attributed these absences to a heart condition. His supervisor informed him that he was required to produce a medical certificate from his physician that he was able to return to work. After several such requests, he refused to produce the certificate because he thought the employer was unreasonable in his request. The board has found that, on the facts of this case, the employer was not unreasonable in requesting that the claimant produce a medical certificate so that the employer might be able to properly evaluate claimant’s abilities to return to work and that claimant’s [1099]*1099refusal of a reasonable request of the employer caused the loss of his employment under conditions which constituted misconduct under the Unemployment Insurance Law. This determination is factual and must be affirmed if based on substantial evidence (Matter of Leuci [Levine], 51 AD2d 603). We find that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination and that, therefore, it must be sustained. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Campanella
183 A.D.2d 1083 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Steele v. Job Service North Dakota
445 N.W.2d 635 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1989)
In re the Claim of Caver
96 A.D.2d 992 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 A.D.2d 1098, 381 N.Y.S.2d 361, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-darrisaw-nyappdiv-1976.