In re the Claim of Czamara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Czamara

184 A.D.2d 983, 585 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8579

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 25, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 184 A.D.2d 983 (In re the Claim of Czamara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Czamara, 184 A.D.2d 983, 585 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8579 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance [984]*984Appeal Board, filed February 20, 1991, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

After being notified that her hours would be reduced from a full-time basis to a part-time basis upon her return from maternity leave, claimant submitted her resignation. At the time she left, however, full-time work continued to be available until claimant began her maternity leave. In addition, there was work available for claimant after her maternity leave, albeit with a reduced work schedule. Under these circumstances, the conclusion by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant left her employment for personal and noncompelling reasons is supported by substantial evidence in the record and must therefore be upheld (see, Matter of Frost [Levine], 52 AD2d 998; Matter of White [Levine], 52 AD2d 1003). Claimant’s remaining contentions have been considered and rejected as lacking in merit.

Weiss, P. J., Levine, Mercure, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance [984]*984Appeal Board, filed February 20, 1991, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

After being notified that her hours would be reduced from a full-time basis to a part-time basis upon her return from maternity leave, claimant submitted her resignation. At the time she left, however, full-time work continued to be available until claimant began her maternity leave. In addition, there was work available for claimant after her maternity leave, albeit with a reduced work schedule. Under these circumstances, the conclusion by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant left her employment for personal and noncompelling reasons is supported by substantial evidence in the record and must therefore be upheld (see, Matter of Frost [Levine], 52 AD2d 998; Matter of White [Levine], 52 AD2d 1003). Claimant’s remaining contentions have been considered and rejected as lacking in merit.

Weiss, P. J., Levine, Mercure, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 A.D.2d 983, 585 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-czamara-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack