In re the Claim of Cummings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Cummings

37 A.D.2d 671, 323 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3671

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 28, 1971

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 37 A.D.2d 671 (In re the Claim of Cummings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Cummings, 37 A.D.2d 671, 323 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3671 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 12, 1971, which disallowed benefits on the ground claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant worked in the shipping department of the Castle Sporting 'Goods, Inc. On the day in question he was unloading three trucks. While so engaged he was directed by his supervisor to unload certain items from an elevator. His reply was that he was too busy at the time. The board found his refusal was tantamount to a voluntary leaving of his employ[672]*672ment without good cause. Since there is substantial evidence to support this finding we may not disturb it. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Aulisi, Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 12, 1971, which disallowed benefits on the ground claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant worked in the shipping department of the Castle Sporting 'Goods, Inc. On the day in question he was unloading three trucks. While so engaged he was directed by his supervisor to unload certain items from an elevator. His reply was that he was too busy at the time. The board found his refusal was tantamount to a voluntary leaving of his employ[672]*672ment without good cause. Since there is substantial evidence to support this finding we may not disturb it. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Aulisi, Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 671, 323 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-cummings-nyappdiv-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack