In re the Claim of Cruz

433 N.E.2d 1278, 55 N.Y.2d 918, 449 N.Y.S.2d 30, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3109
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 9, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 433 N.E.2d 1278 (In re the Claim of Cruz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Cruz, 433 N.E.2d 1278, 55 N.Y.2d 918, 449 N.Y.S.2d 30, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3109 (N.Y. 1982).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (79 AD2d 1081; see, also, Kurcsics v Merchants Mut. Ins. Co., 49 NY2d 451, 459).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Jasen.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Capital Newspapers Division—The Hearst Corp. v. Hartnett
168 A.D.2d 168 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Roberts
93 A.D.2d 296 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
433 N.E.2d 1278, 55 N.Y.2d 918, 449 N.Y.S.2d 30, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-cruz-ny-1982.