In re the Claim of Cruz
433 N.E.2d 1278, 55 N.Y.2d 918, 449 N.Y.S.2d 30, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3109
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (79 AD2d 1081; see, also, Kurcsics v Merchants Mut. Ins. Co., 49 NY2d 451, 459).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Jasen.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Claim of Cruz, 433 N.E.2d 1278, 55 N.Y.2d 918, 449 N.Y.S.2d 30, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3109 (N.Y. 1982).
433 N.E.2d 1278 (In re the Claim of Cruz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Capital Newspapers Division—The Hearst Corp. v. Hartnett
168 A.D.2d 168 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Roberts
93 A.D.2d 296 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)