In re the Claim of Cross
Opinion
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 24, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
The Administrative Law Judge was bound by the arbitrator’s findings of fact, i.e., that claimant deliberately kicked a co-worker and made inappropriate telephone inquiries into the co-worker’s background. The record contains substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision that this behavior constituted misconduct so as to disqualify claimant from receiving benefits.
Mercure, J. P., Cardona, White, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
198 A.D.2d 704 (In re the Claim of Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.