In re the Claim of Crosdale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Crosdale

24 A.D.2d 773, 263 N.Y.S.2d 593, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3192

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 773 (In re the Claim of Crosdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Crosdale, 24 A.D.2d 773, 263 N.Y.S.2d 593, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3192 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court.

Claimant’s name was recorded with the employer; he punched the time clock on each of the two days of hie employment; and we are unable to hold that as a matter of law the board erred in finding that good cause for claimant’s quit was not to be found in the failure of the employer to cause the processing procedures of its personnel office, to be undertaken as promptly as claimant, wished, parlicnlarly so in view of claimant’s failure, to object or to make known the reasons now advanced for his concern. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court.

Claimant’s name was recorded with the employer; he punched the time clock on each of the two days of hie employment; and we are unable to hold that as a matter of law the board erred in finding that good cause for claimant’s quit was not to be found in the failure of the employer to cause the processing procedures of its personnel office, to be undertaken as promptly as claimant, wished, parlicnlarly so in view of claimant’s failure, to object or to make known the reasons now advanced for his concern. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 773, 263 N.Y.S.2d 593, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-crosdale-nyappdiv-1965.