In re the Claim of Council

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Council

201 A.D.2d 821, 607 N.Y.S.2d 493, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1158

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 821 (In re the Claim of Council) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Council, 201 A.D.2d 821, 607 N.Y.S.2d 493, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1158 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 30, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

The record contains substantial evidence to support the Board’s determination that claimant was discharged for misconduct from his position as a supermarket porter for absenteeism. An employee’s repeated failure, despite several warnings, to follow the employer’s rules regarding the necessity of notifying the employer promptly concerning absences may constitute misconduct barring a claimant from receipt of unemployment insurance benefits. Significantly, the Board [822]*822was free to disbelieve claimant’s explanations or excuses for his conduct and to credit the testimony of the employer’s witnesses.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 30, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

The record contains substantial evidence to support the Board’s determination that claimant was discharged for misconduct from his position as a supermarket porter for absenteeism. An employee’s repeated failure, despite several warnings, to follow the employer’s rules regarding the necessity of notifying the employer promptly concerning absences may constitute misconduct barring a claimant from receipt of unemployment insurance benefits. Significantly, the Board [822]*822was free to disbelieve claimant’s explanations or excuses for his conduct and to credit the testimony of the employer’s witnesses.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 821, 607 N.Y.S.2d 493, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-council-nyappdiv-1994.