In re the Claim of Coultman

49 A.D.2d 782, 372 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10810
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 18, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 A.D.2d 782 (In re the Claim of Coultman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Coultman, 49 A.D.2d 782, 372 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 10, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective January 25, 1974 on the ground that she lost her employment through misconduct. Claimant lost her employment after an incident took place in the employer’s cafeteria on January 17, 1974 which resulted in ethnic insults. Claimant contends upon this appeal that this incident did not in and of itself constitute misconduct sufficient to disqualify her from receiving unemployment benefits. There is evidence in the record, however, in the form of testimony of the cashier, that claimant had caused trouble on numerous occasions by not fully paying her bills, so as to hold up the lunch line almost everyday. The personnel manager of the employer testified that claimant had been in the practice of constantly leaving her machine and wandering around many times a day, making personal telephone calls, and refusing to correct errors in her work although her work basically was satisfactory, and that the incident in the cafeteria on January 17 was merely "the straw that broke the camel’s back”. The board found that claimant was discharged because of this cumulative record of events, and we find no basis for upsetting the board’s determination that these incidents taken together constituted sufficient misconduct contrary to the employer’s interests so as to justify dismissal under disqualifying circumstances. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Kane, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Punter
54 A.D.2d 526 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.2d 782, 372 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-coultman-nyappdiv-1975.