In re the Claim of Conte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Conte

207 A.D.2d 944, 616 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8987

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 22, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 207 A.D.2d 944 (In re the Claim of Conte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Conte, 207 A.D.2d 944, 616 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8987 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 28, 1994, which charged claimant with a recoverable overpayment of unemployment insurance benefits.

At her hearing, the sole purpose of which was to determine whether claimant had received an overpayment of unemployment insurance benefits, claimant did not dispute that she had a continuing obligation to repay this money. Upon our review of the record, we find that the Board properly determined that the overpayment in benefits, offset by the amount claimant has already repaid, was recoverable.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 28, 1994, which charged claimant with a recoverable overpayment of unemployment insurance benefits.

At her hearing, the sole purpose of which was to determine whether claimant had received an overpayment of unemployment insurance benefits, claimant did not dispute that she had a continuing obligation to repay this money. Upon our review of the record, we find that the Board properly determined that the overpayment in benefits, offset by the amount claimant has already repaid, was recoverable.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 944, 616 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-conte-nyappdiv-1994.